arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1009.2292

A discrete Gauss-Bonnet type theorem

Abstract

We prove a prototype curvature theorem for subgraphs G of the flat triangular tesselation which play the analogue of "domains" in two dimensional Euclidean space: The Pusieux curvature K(p) = 2|S1(p)| - |S2(p)| is equal to 12 times the Euler characteristic when summed over the boundary of G. Here |S1(p)| is the arc length of the unit sphere of p and |S2(p)| is the arc length of the sphere of radius 2. This curvature 12 formula is discrete Gauss-Bonnet formula or Hopf Umlaufsatz. The curvature introduced here is motivated by analogue constructions in the continuum like the Jacobi equations for geodesic flows. For the first order curvature K1(p) = 6-|S1(p)|, Gauss-Bonnet results are much easier to show, are less "differential geometric" but generalize to rather general 2-dimensional graphs G=(V,E): The sum of the K1 curvatures over the entire graph is 6 times the Euler characteristic of G, where the Euler characteristic is defined as v-e+f where v=|V|,e=|E| and f is the number of triangles. For many abstract two dimensional graphs, the sum over all K curvatures is 60 times the Euler characteristic. Under which conditions this curvature 60 theorem holds is still under investigation. In our proof of the curvature 12 theorem, the concept of dimension for abstract graphs plays an important role: a vertex p of a finite abstract graph X=(V,E) is called 0-dimensional, if p is not connected to any other vertex. A subset G of X is called 0-dimensional if every point of G is 0-dimensional in G. A vertex p of G is called 1-dimensional if S1(p) is zero dimensional. A finite subset G of X is called 1-dimensional if any of the points in G is 1-dimensional. A point p of G is called 2 dimensional, if S1(p) is a one-dimensional graph and a subset G of the graph is called 2-dimensional, if every vertex p of G is 2-dimensional.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oliver Knill. 2010-09-13. A discrete Gauss-Bonnet type theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2292

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN