arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 1007.4597

The Spectrum of the Night Sky Over Kitt Peak: Changes Over Two Decades

Abstract

New absolute spectrophotometry of the Kitt Peak night sky has been obtained in 2009/10, which we compare to previously published data obtained in 1988 and 1999, allowing us to look for changes over the past two decades. A comparison of the data between 1988, 1999 and 2009/10 reveals that the sky brightness of Kitt Peak has stayed remarkably constant over the past 20 years. Compared to 1988, the 2009/10 data show no change in the sky brightness at Zenith though, as expected, the sky glow has increased most dramatically in the direction of Tucson. Comparisons between the 1999 and 2009/10 data suggest that the sky has actually decreased in brightness compared to 10 years ago. However, the older data were both taken during times of increased solar activity. When we correct the measurements for the solar irradiance fluctuations, we find that compared to 20 years ago, the sky is ~0.1 magnitude brighter at Zenith and ~0.3 magnitudes brighter towards Tucson. But even after these corrections, we still find that the sky over Kitt Peak is comparable to what it was 10 years ago at Zenith and ~0.1 magnitude darker towards Tucson. This suggests that the strengthened lighting ordinances Tucson and Pima County established in the early 2000s have been quite effective. With some care, the Kitt Peak night sky will remain this dark many years into the future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kathryn F Neugent, Philip Massey. 2010-07-27. The Spectrum of the Night Sky Over Kitt Peak: Changes Over Two Decades. https://doi.org/10.1086/656425

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Radiation-Hardened, Fault-Aware Quantized Neural Network That Self-Heals

Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly being deployed into radiation-challenging environments in spacecraft, particle accelerators, and, soon, space-based data centers. Instantiated as a learned orchestration of numbers stored in persistent memory, models are susceptible to continual degradation as high-energy particles corrupt data. At inference time, new data passed through the network fundamentally break the off-line assumptions and guarantees of a static model determined during training. To preserve the quality and efficacy of the models, fault tolerance against bit flips is a clear objective. In this work we developed a runtime method for repairing the quantized weights of neural networks (NNs) after bit flips on commodity, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware, without storing extra replicas. Our work extends the well-established Fault-Aware Training (FAT) paradigm by adding an alignment penalty to concentrate undamaged activations and weights into a low-rank subspace, and we then reconstruct flagged corrupted coordinates from the uncorrupted survivors. We call this method {\it Projection Healing} and apply it to six regression benchmarks on quantized NNs. Holding a FAT checkpoint fixed and toggling only the runtime heal gives a further ${\sim}23\%$ reduction in the native-unit excess integral. Across those datasets the method extends the operational scrub interval by a median of $2.04\times$ at a $+5\%$ RMSE degradation and $1.96\times$ at $+50\%$, compared with $1.62\times$ and $1.07\times$ for classical Single Error Correction, Double Error Detection (SECDED). This introduces a new path towards designing resilient data-driven models, complementing established hardware redundancy, ECC, and FAT-based techniques.

astro-ph.IM↗

Gaussian process-based Bayesian imaging of bolometric (sub-)millimetre data

Widefield single-dish telescopes operating at (sub-)mm wavelengths ($λ\sim 4$~mm to 350~$μ$m) tend to feature much faster mapping speeds than radio interferometers at the same wavelengths, and are more suitable for measuring signals on larger spatial scales. However, the data are dominated by atmospheric fluctuations on large scales and by photon and instrumental noise on smaller scales, making it difficult to recover the true astronomical sky. We build on maria-nifty, a Gaussian process-based Bayesian imaging framework for reconstructing sky maps from single-dish telescope data, implemented on top of Numerical Information Field Theory (NIFTy). It uses modular generative models to efficiently separate the astronomical signal from atmospheric emission while providing pixel-wise uncertainty quantification for the reconstructed sky maps. Moreover, our method cleanly separates individual astrophysical signals, even though they are superposed on the sky. Following its successful validation on synthetic time-ordered data generated using the maria software, we apply it to real data observed with the MUSTANG-2 bolometric array on the 100-meter Green Bank Telescope. For the galaxy cluster RXJ1347.5-1145, we separate the extended cluster emission from the compact source at its centre and obtain a smoother map with fewer artefacts compared to a standard maximum-likelihood reconstruction using the same data. The JAX-based implementation and GPU acceleration provide the basis for applying the method to the vastly larger datasets that the next generation of single-dish telescopes will deliver.

astro-ph.IM↗

Estimator Precision and Selection for Up-the-Ramp Sampling with a High-Read-Noise InGaAs Camera

The noise properties of an InGaAs camera vary with gain, requiring a trade-off between implementation complexity and precision. Using generalized least squares (GLS) with known covariance as the precision benchmark, we examine the applicability and precision penalties of ordinary least squares (OLS) and correlated double sampling (CDS) at different noise operating points. We define $η=fT/σ_\mathrm{R}^2$, where $f$ is the total pixel count rate, $T$ the fitting span, and $σ_\mathrm{R}$ the single-read noise. For constant flux, uniform sampling, and independent white read noise plus Poisson noise, established finite-sampling variance expressions give equal OLS and CDS variances at $η=10$ for $N\ge4$ reads; OLS is favored below this boundary and CDS above it. Analytical and Monte Carlo comparisons for three gain modes quantify the precision loss of the better simplified estimator relative to GLS. In high-gain on-sky data, choosing OLS at 20 s and CDS at 90 s increases the background residual standard deviation by 3.55% and 3.01%, respectively, relative to two-iteration feasible GLS (FGLS). Photometry of 21 common sources does not clearly resolve most estimator differences. The observed OLS-CDS crossover occurs earlier than the ideal prediction, indicating that temporal covariance beyond the ideal model also affects the selection boundary. Observational validation is limited to high gain; medium- and low-gain choices rely on theory and simulations using calibrated parameters. OLS or CDS can replace GLS with a small precision penalty at suitable operating points. The ideal criterion provides an initial selection rule, whose practical boundary requires validation against observed temporal covariance.

astro-ph.IM↗