arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1003.3165

Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions

Dirk Helbing·Attila Szolnoki·Matjaz Perc·Gyorgy Szabo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Situations where individuals have to contribute to joint efforts or share scarce resources are ubiquitous. Yet, without proper mechanisms to ensure cooperation, the evolutionary pressure to maximize individual success tends to create a tragedy of the commons (such as over-fishing or the destruction of our environment). This contribution addresses a number of related puzzles of human behavior with an evolutionary game theoretical approach as it has been successfully used to explain the behavior of other biological species many times, from bacteria to vertebrates. Our agent-based model distinguishes individuals applying four different behavioral strategies: non-cooperative individuals ("defectors"), cooperative individuals abstaining from punishment efforts (called "cooperators" or "second-order free-riders"), cooperators who punish non-cooperative behavior ("moralists"), and defectors, who punish other defectors despite being non-cooperative themselves ("immoralists"). By considering spatial interactions with neighboring individuals, our model reveals several interesting effects: First, moralists can fully eliminate cooperators. This spreading of punishing behavior requires a segregation of behavioral strategies and solves the "second-order free-rider problem". Second, the system behavior changes its character significantly even after very long times ("who laughs last laughs best effect"). Third, the presence of a number of defectors can largely accelerate the victory of moralists over non-punishing cooperators. Forth, in order to succeed, moralists may profit from immoralists in a way that appears like an "unholy collaboration". Our findings suggest that the consideration of punishment strategies allows to understand the establishment and spreading of "moral behavior" by means of game-theoretical concepts. This demonstrates that quantitative biological modeling approaches are powerful even in domains that have been addressed with non-mathematical concepts so far. The complex dynamics of certain social behaviors becomes understandable as result of an evolutionary competition between different behavioral strategies.

Explore related subjects

physics.soc-phq-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dirk Helbing, Attila Szolnoki, Matjaz Perc, Gyorgy Szabo. 2010-03-16. Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Optimality as a Generative Principle for Network Structure

Most real-world networks have evolved or been engineered to optimize some function, yet a unified framework for studying optimal networks across domains is lacking. We introduce GradNet, an AI-enabled framework that treats network topology as a continuously differentiable object, enabling the design and study of networks that optimize structural and dynamical objectives amenable to automatic differentiation under realistic constraints. We derive general optimality conditions, including an equimarginal principle for linear budgets, that make optimized networks analytically tractable. Canonical network features emerge spontaneously from constrained optimization: maximizing Kuramoto synchronization under coupling budgets yields sparse, bipartite, frequency-disassortative networks; minimizing social tension in opinion dynamics reproduces the factional split in Zachary's karate club; and maximizing communication capacity in spatial quantum networks under distance-dependent costs recovers minimum spanning trees. GradNet thus serves both as a network design tool scalable beyond $10^5$ nodes and as a scientific probe of structure-function relationships.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Community-Centers Identify Robust Biomarker in High-Dimensional, Low-Sample-Size Gene Expression Data

High-dimensional, low-sample-size bulk gene expression data poses a fundamental challenge in transcriptomics, which typically includes tens of thousands of genes but relatively few samples, leading to overfitting and unstable selection for key features as biomarkers. We propose a regression by community centers (RCC) framework tailored for such data. RCC converts gene expression data into a feature proximity network and leverages the phase transition of the giant connected component to identify a critical distance threshold that yields a sparse yet maximally informative network representation, indicated by a minimum normalized shortest compression length. Intuitively, at the criticality, the network balances fragmentation and over-connectivity, allowing meaningful gene-gene associations communities to emerge while filtering noises, such that community-centers capture the most informative and non-redundant signals. These representative genes are then fed to a simple ordinary least squares (OLS) model for downstream predictions. Across five bulk gene expression datasets, RCC displays exceptional prediction performance, clearly outperforming benchmark methods, remains robust to missing data and noises, and does not rely on external biological knowledge. These results suggest that network-based representations provide an effective and general framework for high-dimensional, low-sample-size prediction tasks beyond transcriptomics and illustrate how network-science ideas can support robust learning in data-scarce regimes.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

The efficacy-competitiveness frontier in the Swiss system

An ideal tournament is both efficacious and attractive: it selects the best player as the winner, but only at the end of the tournament in order to maintain suspense as long as possible. We identify and explore the trade-off between these criteria in Swiss-system chess team tournaments via simulations. Organising more rounds is shown to improve efficacy but increase the probability of a stakeless last round. The 2008 reform in the Chess Olympiad ranking is found to be a questionable move, as the previous rule based on board points determines the efficacy-competitiveness frontier, regardless of whether two or three points are awarded for winning a match. Combining board points and match points is better than using match points only. Our results can help optimise the design of the Swiss system, which, besides chess, is also widely used in e-sports.

physics.soc-ph↗