The Euler-Savary Formula for One-Parameter Planar Hyperbolic Motion

Soley Ersoy; Murat Tosun

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1001.0138

The Euler-Savary Formula for One-Parameter Planar Hyperbolic Motion

Soley Ersoy·Murat Tosun

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One-parameter hyperbolic planar motion was first studied by S. Y$\ddot{\texttt{u}}$ce and N. Kuruo$\tilde{\texttt{g}}$lu. Moreover, they analyzed the relationships between the absolute, relative and sliding velocities of one-parameter hyperbolic planar motion as well as the related pole curves, \cite{Yuc}. One-parameter planar motions in the Euclidean plane $\mathbb{E}^2$ and the Euler-Savary formula in one-parameter planar motions were given by M$\ddot{\texttt{u}}$ller, \cite{Mul}. In the present article, one hyperbolic plane moving relative to two other hyperbolic planes, one moving and the other fixed, was taken into consideration and the relation between the absolute, relative and sliding velocities of this movement was obtained. In addition, a canonical relative system for one-parameter hyperbolic planar motion was defined. Euler-Savary formula, which gives the relationship between the curvature of trajectory curves, was obtained with the help of this relative system.

Explore related subjects

math.DG math.MG

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Soley Ersoy, Murat Tosun. 2009-12-31. The Euler-Savary Formula for One-Parameter Planar Hyperbolic Motion. https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0138

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG↗

arXiv2026

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG↗

arXiv2026

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG↗