arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0912.3275

A Formal Framework for Mobile Robot Patrolling in Arbitrary Environments with Adversaries

Nicola Basilico·Nicola Gatti·Francesco Amigoni
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Using mobile robots for autonomous patrolling of environments to prevent intrusions is a topic of increasing practical relevance. One of the most challenging scientific issues is the problem of finding effective patrolling strategies that, at each time point, determine the next moves of the patrollers in order to maximize some objective function. In the very last years this problem has been addressed in a game theoretical fashion, explicitly considering the presence of an adversarial intruder. The general idea is that of modeling a patrolling situation as a game, played by the patrollers and the intruder, and of studying the equilibria of this game to derive effective patrolling strategies. In this paper we present a game theoretical formal framework for the determination of effective patrolling strategies that extends the previous proposals appeared in the literature, by considering environments with arbitrary topology and arbitrary preferences for the agents. The main original contributions of this paper are the formulation of the patrolling game for generic graph environments, an algorithm for finding a deterministic equilibrium strategy, which is a fixed path through the vertices of the graph, and an algorithm for finding a non-deterministic equilibrium strategy, which is a set of probabilities for moving between adjacent vertices of the graph. Both the algorithms are analytically studied and experimentally validated, to assess their properties and efficiency.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicola Basilico, Nicola Gatti, Francesco Amigoni. 2009-12-16. A Formal Framework for Mobile Robot Patrolling in Arbitrary Environments with Adversaries. https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3275

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗