arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0912.1180

Comparing the relation between star formation and galaxy mass in different environments

Benedetta Vulcani·Bianca M. Poggianti·Rose A. Finn·Gregory Rudnick·Vandana Desai·Steven Bamford
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Analyzing 24 mu m MIPS/Spitzer data and the [O II]3727 line of a sample of galaxies at 0.4 < z < 0.8 from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS), we investigate the ongoing star formation rate (SFR) and the specific star formation rate (SSFR) as a function of stellar mass in galaxy clusters and groups, and compare with field studies. As for the field, we find a decline in SFR with time, indicating that star formation (SF) was more active in the past, and a decline in SSFR as galaxy stellar mass increases, showing that the current SF contributes more to the fractional growth of low-mass galaxies than high-mass galaxies. However, we find a lower median SFR (by a factor of ~1.5) in cluster star-forming galaxies than in the field. The difference is highly significant when all Spitzer and emission-line galaxies are considered, regardless of color. It remains significant at z>0.6 after removing red emission-line (REL) galaxies, to avoid possible AGN contamination. While there is overlap between the cluster and field SFR-Mass relations, we find a population of cluster galaxies (10-25%) with reduced SFR for their mass. These are likely to be in transition from star-forming to passive. Comparing separately clusters and groups at z>0.6, only cluster trends are significantly different from the field, and the average cluster SFR at a given mass is ~2 times lower than the field. We conclude that the average SFR in star-forming galaxies varies with galaxy environment at a fixed galaxy mass.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Benedetta Vulcani, Bianca M. Poggianti, Rose A. Finn, Gregory Rudnick, Vandana Desai, Steven Bamford. 2009-12-07. Comparing the relation between star formation and galaxy mass in different environments. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205%2F710%2F1%2Fl1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraints on the Thomson optical depth to the CMB from the Lyman-$α$ forest

We present the first constraints on the electron optical depth to reionization, $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$, from the Lyman-$α$ forest alone for physically motivated reionization models that match the reionization's end-point, $z_{\rm{end}}$, required by the same astrophysical probe, and for symmetric reionization models with fixed duration, $Δz$, commonly adopted in CMB reionization analyses. Compared to traditional estimates from the latter, the Lyman-$α$ forest traces the ionization state of the IGM through its coupling with the thermal state. We find an explicit mapping between the two solving the chemistry and temperature evolution equations for hydrogen and helium. Our results yield $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$=$0.040^{+0.042}_{-0.018}$ (95\% C.L) and $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$=$0.041^{+0.028}_{-0.017}$ for reionization models with $z_{\rm{end}}$ and $Δz$-fixed, respectively. With mock Lyman-$α$ forest data that mimics the precision of future larger quasar sample datasets, we would potentially obtain tighter $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$ constraints, paving the way for CMB-independent constraints on the epoch of reionization from a large-scale structure probe.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Non-minimally Coupled Running Curvaton for DESI-motivated Dynamical Dark Energy

Recent DESI BAO data combined with CMB and supernova measurements suggest a dynamical dark energy that can cross the phantom divide. We show that introducing a non-minimal coupling $ξχ^2R$ to the running-curvaton framework allows a single field to drive early-universe curvature perturbations and late-time phantom-crossing cosmic acceleration without ghost instabilities. Using MCMC background likelihoods with DESI DR2 BAO, Pantheon+ SNe, and a reduced CMB prior, we constrain the cosmological parameters: $H_0 = 67.88^{+0.53}_{-0.61}\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, $Ω_m = 0.3072^{+0.0059}_{-0.0054}$, $w_0 = -0.922^{+0.055}_{-0.063}$, and $w_a = -0.205^{+0.173}_{-0.182}$. Parameter degeneracies leave the coupling constants weakly constrained, highlighting the need for full perturbation-level analysis using CMB spectra and lensing.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Relation Between Field-Level Posteriors, Correlators, and their Likelihoods

We develop a field-level posterior for cosmological data by marginalizing over initial conditions and noise in a general forward model. While our focus is on large-scale structure data, the results generalize to any weakly non-Gaussian observable. Moreover, the construction is non-perturbative with respect to the forward model and applies equally well to perturbative calculations, simulation-based predictions, and more general effective descriptions. Expanding the FLP around its Gaussian limit, we derive a general expression for the Fisher matrix and reorganize the field-level information into contributions associated with the connected correlators of the evolved field. This makes explicit which terms are captured by likelihood analyses based on the power spectrum, the bispectrum, or finite sets of summary statistics, and which are lost under compression. We recover the standard Gaussian-covariance result for the power spectrum, show that the Gaussian bispectrum likelihood reproduces the corresponding field-level contribution, and show how cross-covariances among summaries progressively reconstruct more of the full field-level information. As an application to the BAO scale, we show how the field contains all the information required for its optimal reconstruction in the presence of noise, and identify the contributions in the FLP needed to attain this limit. We also show that the reconstruction of the initial field arises naturally as a byproduct of our approach, yielding the optimal estimate of the initial conditions given the data and the noise. Our results provide a unified framework to compare field-level and correlator-based inference, to quantify the information loss induced by compression, and to explore the role of stochasticity.

astro-ph.CO↗