arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0911.5642

A Theory of Sampling for Continuous-time Metric Temporal Logic

Carlo A. Furia·Matteo Rossi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper revisits the classical notion of sampling in the setting of real-time temporal logics for the modeling and analysis of systems. The relationship between the satisfiability of Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) formulas over continuous-time models and over discrete-time models is studied. It is shown to what extent discrete-time sequences obtained by sampling continuous-time signals capture the semantics of MTL formulas over the two time domains. The main results apply to "flat" formulas that do not nest temporal operators and can be applied to the problem of reducing the verification problem for MTL over continuous-time models to the same problem over discrete-time, resulting in an automated partial practically-efficient discretization technique.

Explore related subjects

cs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carlo A. Furia, Matteo Rossi. 2010-04-06. A Theory of Sampling for Continuous-time Metric Temporal Logic. https://doi.org/10.1145/1838552.1838560

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CMSO-transductions for tree-like graph decompositions

We give $\operatorname{CMSO}$-transductions that, given a graph $G$, output its modular decomposition, its split decomposition and its bi-join decomposition. This improves results by Courcelle [Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2006] who gave such transductions using order-invariant $\operatorname{MSO}$, a strictly more expressive logic than $\operatorname{CMSO}$. Our methods more generally yield $\operatorname{C}_2 \operatorname{MSO}$-transductions that output the canonical decompositions of weakly-partitive set systems and weakly-bipartitive systems of bipartitions.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

Pseudo-Formalization for Automatic Proof Verification

Reliable verification of proofs remains a bottleneck for training and evaluating AI systems on hard mathematical reasoning. Fully formal proofs, in languages like Lean, are easy to verify because they are unambiguous and modular. Most proofs, particularly those written by AI systems, have neither property, and translating them into formal languages remains challenging in many frontier math settings. We propose Pseudo-Formalization (PF), a proof format that captures the modularity and precision of formal proofs while retaining the flexibility of natural language. A Pseudo-Formal proof is decomposed into self-contained modules, each stating its premises, conclusion, and proof in natural language. To verify the correctness of a regular natural language proof, an LLM translates it to Pseudo-Formal and then verifies each module independently, an algorithm we call Block Verification (BV). We evaluate PF+BV on two benchmarks spanning olympiad and research-level mathematics, where it pareto-dominates LLM-as-judge baselines on error-finding precision and recall. To support future work, we release our research-level proof verification benchmark ArxivMathGradingBench.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

Gödel's and Scott's Variants of the Ontological Argument in Lean 4 and TPTP THF

The Isabelle/HOL dataset of Benzmüller and Scott's study of Gödel's ontological argument and Scott's variant (Monatshefte für Mathematik, 2025) is carried to Lean 4 and from there back to the automated provers, as a benchmark independent of either proof assistant. The port covers all thirty theories, structure and names preserved: 548 statements compare identical as parsed, every named result is proved again, and five results the original reports without replaying them are proved here. For every theorem, #print axioms gives the postulates its proof consumes: Scott's necessary existence and modal collapse need only a symmetric frame, confirming that KB suffices. The benchmark, in TPTP THF and SMT-LIB, turns the steps of an argument debated in philosophy into 294 theorems, alongside 45 statements the original refutes or leaves open, ten left open there. Five THF provers, and cvc5 on SMT-LIB, prove 227 theorems within ten seconds on one core and 232 within sixty, and none proves any of the 45. E and Leo-II solve the most, although Leo-II's calculus has been unchanged for about a decade and was only repaired and modernised here, as release 2.2. Vampire, whose later version won the higher-order division of CASC-30, solves the most in no configuration. Only E and Leo-II are measured in their own automatic mode: Zipperposition proves 101 in a single mode and 213 with its developers' portfolio, Vampire 174 without options and 209 with a higher-order schedule that its CASC mode does not select, and Leo-III 159 alone and 177 with E as partner.

cs.LO↗