arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 0905.3611

You could simplify calculus

Abstract

I explain a direct approach to differentiation and integration. Instead of relying on the general notions of real numbers, limits and continuity, we treat functions as the primary objects of our theory, and view differentiation as division of f(x)-f(a) by x-a in a certain class of functions. When f is a polynomial the division can be carried out explicitly. To see why a polynomial with a positive derivative is increasing (the monotonicity theorem), we use the estimate |f(x)-f(a)-f'(a)(x-a)|<=K(x-a)^2. By making it into a definition we arrive at the notion of uniform Lipschitz differentiability (ULD), and see that the derivative of a ULD function is Lipschitz. Taking different moduli of continuity instead of |.|, we get different flavors of calculus, each rather elementary, but all together covering the total range of continuously differentiable functions. Using functions continuous at a, we recapture the classical definition of differentiability at a point. We also see that ULD is equivalent to divisibility of f(x)-f(a) by x-a in the class of Lipschitz functions of two variables, x and a. The analogous fact is true for any subadditive modulus of continuity. In this bottom-up, computational, one modulus of continuity at a time approach, the monotonicity theorem takes the central stage and provides the aspects of the subject important for practical applications. The weighty ontological issues of compactness and completeness can be treated lightly or postponed, since they are hardly used in this streamlined approach that pretty much follows the Vladimir Arnold's "principle of minimal generality, according to which every idea should first be understood in the simplest situation; only then can the method developed be applied to more complicated cases." I discuss a generalization to many variables briefly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Livshits. 2009-05-22. You could simplify calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.3611

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO