arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0903.0902

Observing the Evolution of the Universe

James Aguirre·Alexandre Amblard·Amjad Ashoorioon·Carlo Baccigalupi·Amedeo Balbi·James Bartlett·Nicola Bartolo·Dominic Benford·Mark Birkinshaw·Jamie Bock·Dick Bond·Julian Borrill·Franois Bouchet·Michael Bridges·Emory Bunn·Erminia Calabrese·Christopher Cantalupo·Ana Caramete·Carmelita Carbone·Suchetana Chatterjee·Sarah Church·David Chuss·Carlo Contaldi·Asantha Cooray·Sudeep Das·Francesco De Bernardis·Paolo De Bernardis·Gianfranco De Zotti·Jacques Delabrouille·F. -Xavier Dsert·Mark Devlin·Clive Dickinson·Simon Dicker·Matt Dobbs·Scott Dodelson·Olivier Dore·Jessie Dotson·Joanna Dunkley·Maria Cristina Falvella·Dale Fixsen·Pablo Fosalba·Joseph Fowler·Evalyn Gates·Walter Gear·Sunil Golwala·Krzysztof Gorski·Alessandro Gruppuso·Josh Gundersen·Mark Halpern·Shaul Hanany·Masashi Hazumi·Carlos Hernandez-Monteagudo·Mark Hertzberg·Gary Hinshaw·Christopher Hirata·Eric Hivon·Warren Holmes·William Holzapfel·Wayne Hu·Johannes Hubmayr·Kevin Huffenberger·Kent Irwin·Mark Jackson·Andrew Jaffe·Bradley Johnson·William Jones·Manoj Kaplinghat·Brian Keating·Reijo Keskitalo·Justin Khoury·Will Kinney·Theodore Kisner·Lloyd Knox·Alan Kogut·Eiichiro Komatsu·Arthur Kosowsky·John Kovac·Lawrence Krauss·Hannu Kurki-Suonio·Susana Landau·Charles Lawrence·Samuel Leach·Adrian Lee·Erik Leitch·Rodrigo Leonardi·Julien Lesgourgues·Andrew Liddle·Eugene Lim·Michele Limon·Marilena Loverde·Philip Lubin·Antonio Magalhaes·Davide Maino·Tobias Marriage·Victoria Martin·Sabino Matarrese·John Mather·Harsh Mathur·Tomotake Matsumura·Pieter Meerburg
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

How did the universe evolve? The fine angular scale (l>1000) temperature and polarization anisotropies in the CMB are a Rosetta stone for understanding the evolution of the universe. Through detailed measurements one may address everything from the physics of the birth of the universe to the history of star formation and the process by which galaxies formed. One may in addition track the evolution of the dark energy and discover the net neutrino mass. We are at the dawn of a new era in which hundreds of square degrees of sky can be mapped with arcminute resolution and sensitivities measured in microKelvin. Acquiring these data requires the use of special purpose telescopes such as the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), located in Chile, and the South Pole Telescope (SPT). These new telescopes are outfitted with a new generation of custom mm-wave kilo-pixel arrays. Additional instruments are in the planning stages.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

James Aguirre, Alexandre Amblard, Amjad Ashoorioon, Carlo Baccigalupi, Amedeo Balbi, James Bartlett, Nicola Bartolo, Dominic Benford, Mark Birkinshaw, Jamie Bock, Dick Bond, Julian Borrill, Franois Bouchet, Michael Bridges, Emory Bunn, Erminia Calabrese, Christopher Cantalupo, Ana Caramete, Carmelita Carbone, Suchetana Chatterjee, Sarah Church, David Chuss, Carlo Contaldi, Asantha Cooray, Sudeep Das, Francesco De Bernardis, Paolo De Bernardis, Gianfranco De Zotti, Jacques Delabrouille, F. -Xavier Dsert, Mark Devlin, Clive Dickinson, Simon Dicker, Matt Dobbs, Scott Dodelson, Olivier Dore, Jessie Dotson, Joanna Dunkley, Maria Cristina Falvella, Dale Fixsen, Pablo Fosalba, Joseph Fowler, Evalyn Gates, Walter Gear, Sunil Golwala, Krzysztof Gorski, Alessandro Gruppuso, Josh Gundersen, Mark Halpern, Shaul Hanany, Masashi Hazumi, Carlos Hernandez-Monteagudo, Mark Hertzberg, Gary Hinshaw, Christopher Hirata, Eric Hivon, Warren Holmes, William Holzapfel, Wayne Hu, Johannes Hubmayr, Kevin Huffenberger, Kent Irwin, Mark Jackson, Andrew Jaffe, Bradley Johnson, William Jones, Manoj Kaplinghat, Brian Keating, Reijo Keskitalo, Justin Khoury, Will Kinney, Theodore Kisner, Lloyd Knox, Alan Kogut, Eiichiro Komatsu, Arthur Kosowsky, John Kovac, Lawrence Krauss, Hannu Kurki-Suonio, Susana Landau, Charles Lawrence, Samuel Leach, Adrian Lee, Erik Leitch, Rodrigo Leonardi, Julien Lesgourgues, Andrew Liddle, Eugene Lim, Michele Limon, Marilena Loverde, Philip Lubin, Antonio Magalhaes, Davide Maino, Tobias Marriage, Victoria Martin, Sabino Matarrese, John Mather, Harsh Mathur, Tomotake Matsumura, Pieter Meerburg. 2009-03-05. Observing the Evolution of the Universe. https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.0902

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO↗