Measuring Independence of Datasets

Vladimir Braverman; Rafail Ostrovsky

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0903.0034

Measuring Independence of Datasets

Vladimir Braverman·Rafail Ostrovsky

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A data stream model represents setting where approximating pairwise, or $k$-wise, independence with sublinear memory is of considerable importance. In the streaming model the joint distribution is given by a stream of $k$-tuples, with the goal of testing correlations among the components measured over the entire stream. In the streaming model, Indyk and McGregor (SODA 08) recently gave exciting new results for measuring pairwise independence. The Indyk and McGregor methods provide $\log{n}$-approximation under statistical distance between the joint and product distributions in the streaming model. Indyk and McGregor leave, as their main open question, the problem of improving their $\log n$-approximation for the statistical distance metric. In this paper we solve the main open problem posed by of Indyk and McGregor for the statistical distance for pairwise independence and extend this result to any constant $k$. In particular, we present an algorithm that computes an $(ε, δ)$-approximation of the statistical distance between the joint and product distributions defined by a stream of $k$-tuples. Our algorithm requires $O(({1\over ε}\log({nm\over δ}))^{(30+k)^k})$ memory and a single pass over the data stream.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DB cs.IR cs.PF

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Vladimir Braverman, Rafail Ostrovsky. 2009-03-01. Measuring Independence of Datasets. https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.0034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗