arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 0902.2885

The Ising Model for Neural Data: Model Quality and Approximate Methods for Extracting Functional Connectivity

Abstract

We study pairwise Ising models for describing the statistics of multi-neuron spike trains, using data from a simulated cortical network. We explore efficient ways of finding the optimal couplings in these models and examine their statistical properties. To do this, we extract the optimal couplings for subsets of size up to 200 neurons, essentially exactly, using Boltzmann learning. We then study the quality of several approximate methods for finding the couplings by comparing their results with those found from Boltzmann learning. Two of these methods- inversion of the TAP equations and an approximation proposed by Sessak and Monasson- are remarkably accurate. Using these approximations for larger subsets of neurons, we find that extracting couplings using data from a subset smaller than the full network tends systematically to overestimate their magnitude. This effect is described qualitatively by infinite-range spin glass theory for the normal phase. We also show that a globally-correlated input to the neurons in the network lead to a small increase in the average coupling. However, the pair-to-pair variation of the couplings is much larger than this and reflects intrinsic properties of the network. Finally, we study the quality of these models by comparing their entropies with that of the data. We find that they perform well for small subsets of the neurons in the network, but the fit quality starts to deteriorate as the subset size grows, signalling the need to include higher order correlations to describe the statistics of large networks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yasser Roudi, Joanna Tyrcha, John Hertz. 2009-02-17. The Ising Model for Neural Data: Model Quality and Approximate Methods for Extracting Functional Connectivity. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.79.051915

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

High Reconstruction Quality and Restart Repeatability Do Not Guarantee Recovery of Ground-Truth Muscle Synergies

High reconstruction quality and agreement across repeated fits do not necessarily establish recovery of muscle synergies. We tested whether a variance-accounted-for (VAF)/elbow rule recovers the generating synergy count and spatial vectors, whether high restart repeatability indicates recovery, and how five design factors affect recovery. Non-negative matrix factorisation was applied to 4,320 synthetic 16-muscle datasets varying generating rank, noise, trial count, spatial similarity and activation overlap. Combined recovery required the correct rank and cosine similarity of at least 0.80 for every matched spatial vector. Factor effects and two-factor interactions were assessed using exploratory heteroscedastic Wald tests with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment. Rank selection was exact in 17.6% of datasets, too low in 54.9% and too high in 27.5%; combined recovery was 13.9%. Among fits with VAF at least 0.90, only 11.3% achieved combined recovery. Among 3,762 datasets with spatial repeatability at least 0.95, 19.6% had the correct rank and 15.7% achieved combined recovery. All five factors were associated with recovery (adjusted p < 0.001). Recovery declined from 26.2% to 1.7% with increasing spatial similarity and from 26.2% to 2.2% with increasing activation overlap. It was lower at ranks 7-9 than at 3-5, increased from 11.0% with 3 trials to 15.8% with 80 trials, and varied non-monotonically with noise. Five noiseless signals synthesised from measured-sEMG reference factors also showed under-selection despite VAF above 0.918. Under this selector, high reconstruction quality and restart agreement were insufficient indicators of correct rank and spatial recovery. Muscle-synergy interpretation should account for rank sensitivity and the separability of spatial and activation patterns.

q-bio.QM

A hierarchical memory architecture overcomes context limits in long-horizon multi-agent computational modeling

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet their stateless architecture fundamentally limits deployment in long-horizon research workflows requiring multi-session continuity and quantitative rigor. Here we present Ensemble QSP, a multi-agent framework featuring a three-layer hierarchical memory architecture that bounds injected context (median 301 tokens, max 4,050) by capping state categories and evicting completed work. This enables continuous autonomous operation without context degradation. The system orchestrates five specialist worker agents under domain-expert principal investigators (PIs), enforcing physical constraints through physics-based checklists and structured domain knowledge. Comprehensive benchmarking demonstrates autonomous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model selection, improved parameter recovery relative to single-agent baselines, and robust interpretation of linguistically diverse prompts. Replication with open-weight models (DeepSeek-V4-Flash/Pro, Llama 3.1 70B) confirmed these architectural conclusions across PKPD modeling, literature synthesis, and PBPK model implementation, proving the framework is independent of proprietary LLMs. Feature-level ablations show that memory, retrieval, and PI oversight address distinct scientific failure modes, though underlying LLM capability remains consequential for stringent physical-consistency checks. The architecture is structurally agnostic to computational biology; adding a new scientific domain requires only a new PI-agent configuration.

q-bio.QM

Foundation-model-based multi-label phenotyping of combined hyperkinetic movement disorders

Movement disorders (MDs) frequently co-occur, yet phenomenological and severity assessment shows substantial inter-rater variability. Markerless video could improve reproducibility, but prior work is largely single-symptom, depends on standardized acquisition, and lacks validation and transfer across ages and sites. We combined two foundation models into one frozen backbone: Segment Anything Model 3 (SAM 3) for dense, per-frame markerless segmentation summarized into geometric, contour and grid kinematic signals, and TabICLv2, a tabular foundation model, for in-context multi-label classification of eight hyperkinetic MD phenomenologies. Trained on standardized recordings of 21 adults and 4 controls, it transferred unchanged to two independent datasets, pediatric (n=12) and tremor-dominant adult (n=20), assessed with the CODY-SAMP scale; only the patient-level decision step was recalibrated per site. Under clinician consensus labels, false positives fell to zero in both datasets. Dystonia recovered perfectly (7/7 pediatric; 15/15 adult held-out), chorea fully in children (3/3), and tremor was recovered in adults (11/15) once a tremor-rich cohort made it evaluable, through recalibration alone. Per-region effect-size analysis gave clinically coherent, phenomenology-specific signals and identified myoclonus as the principal failure. Against YOLOv8 sparse keypoints, the dense representation matched under clinician permissive labels (Jaccard 0.63 vs 0.63) and was markedly more robust under clinician-label consensus (0.93 vs 0.76). This frozen foundation-model backbone with light per-site calibration yields transferable, interpretable, conservative multi-label phenotyping of co-occurring hyperkinetic MDs across ages and from standardized to routine video, adding robustness on high-confidence, clinician-agreed labels. Prospective multi-centre validation is required before clinical use.

q-bio.QM