arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 0901.2381

Visualizing a large-scale structure of production network by N-body simulation

Abstract

Our recent study of a nation-wide production network uncovered a community structure, namely how firms are connected by supplier-customer links into tightly-knit groups with high density in intra-groups and with lower connectivity in inter-groups. Here we propose a method to visualize the community structure by a graph layout based on a physical analogy. The layout can be calculated in a practical computation-time and is possible to be accelerated by a special-purpose device of GRAPE (gravity pipeline) developed for astrophysical N-body simulation. We show that the method successfully identifies the communities in a hierarchical way by applying it to the manufacturing sector comprising tenth million nodes and a half million edges. In addition, we discuss several limitations of this method, and propose a possible way to avoid all those problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yoshi Fujiwara. 2009-01-16. Visualizing a large-scale structure of production network by N-body simulation. https://doi.org/10.1143/ptps.179.167

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

How Well Do LLMs Perform in Peer Review? Evidence from Finance and Accounting

Referees increasingly use large language models (LLMs), while finance and accounting journals disagree about whether to allow it. We ask which part of a referee's job the models can do. GPT-4o, whose training data end before the 2024 conference season, referees the papers presented at the 2024 AFA and NBER finance meetings, and we compare its verdicts with publication in the top-three finance journals over the next two years. Papers the model scores one standard deviation higher are 44\% more likely to be published, net of author reputation. The result is not driven by look-ahead bias, as the model does not recall the outcomes. The information comes from its judgements of correctness and exposition. Its judgements of originality and significance carry none, and a referee guide that stresses importance does not help. The split between correctness and contribution holds for accounting papers and for a newer model, GPT-5. LLMs can check whether research is right, but not whether it matters. The technical check can go to the model, while the judgement of contribution stays with people.

q-fin.GN↗

Board gender diversity and emissions performance: Insights from panel regressions, machine learning, and explainable AI

With European Union initiatives mandating gender quotas on corporate boards, a key question arises: Is greater board gender diversity (BGD) associated with better emissions performance (EP)? To answer this question, we examine the influence of BGD on EP across a sample of European firms from 2016 to 2022. Using panel regressions, advanced machine learning algorithms, and explainable AI, we reveal a non-linear relationship. Specifically, EP improves with BGD up to an optimal level of approximately 35 %, beyond which further increases in BGD yield no additional improvement in EP. A minimum BGD threshold of 22 % is necessary for meaningful improvements in EP. To assess the legitimacy of EP outcomes, this study examines whether ESG controversies weaken the BGD-EP relationship. The results show no significant effect, suggesting that BGD's impact is driven by governance mechanisms rather than symbolic actions. Additionally, path analysis indicates that while environmental innovation contributes to EP, it is not the mediating channel through which BGD promotes EP. The results have implications for academics, businesses, and regulators.

q-fin.GN↗

The Evolution of Technology Portfolios and Firm Profitability in the European Power Sector

Power firms' generation portfolios are long-lived and change slowly. We study how this inertia shapes profitability as market conditions shift. Linking plant-level data to financial accounts for over 1,300 EU power firms over 2002-2023, we find renewable- and fossil-oriented firms earned similar returns until 2018. Thereafter, renewable-oriented firms earned about 3.2 percentage points higher return on assets. Exposure to rising carbon and gas prices accounts for roughly 60% of this divergence. Durable portfolios thus turn market shifts into sustained profit differences.

q-fin.GN↗