arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 0802.2130

Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results

Abstract

We introduce a hierarchy of problems between the \textsc{Dominating Set} problem and the \textsc{Power Dominating Set} (PDS) problem called the $\ell$-round power dominating set ($\ell$-round PDS, for short) problem. For $\ell=1$, this is the \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, and for $\ell\geq n-1$, this is the PDS problem; here $n$ denotes the number of nodes in the input graph. In PDS the goal is to find a minimum size set of nodes $S$ that power dominates all the nodes, where a node $v$ is power dominated if (1) $v$ is in $S$ or it has a neighbor in $S$, or (2) $v$ has a neighbor $u$ such that $u$ and all of its neighbors except $v$ are power dominated. Note that rule (1) is the same as for the \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, and that rule (2) is a type of propagation rule that applies iteratively. The $\ell$-round PDS problem has the same set of rules as PDS, except we apply rule (2) in ``parallel'' in at most $\ell-1$ rounds. We prove that $\ell$-round PDS cannot be approximated better than $2^{\log^{1-ε}{n}}$ even for $\ell=4$ in general graphs. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm to solve $\ell$-round PDS optimally in polynomial time on graphs of bounded tree-width. We present a PTAS (polynomial time approximation scheme) for $\ell$-round PDS on planar graphs for $\ell=O(\tfrac{\log{n}}{\log{\log{n}}})$. Finally, we give integer programming formulations for $\ell$-round PDS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ashkan Aazami. 2008-02-15. Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results. https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2130

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS