arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 0801.0351

Kolmogorov complexities Kmax, Kmin on computable partially ordered sets

Abstract

We introduce a machine free mathematical framework to get a natural formalization of some general notions of infinite computation in the context of Kolmogorov complexity. Namely, the classes Max^{X\to D}_{PR} and Max^{X\to D}_{Rec} of functions X \to D which are pointwise maximum of partial or total computable sequences of functions where D = (D,<) is some computable partially ordered set. The enumeration theorem and the invariance theorem always hold for Max^{X\to D}_{PR}, leading to a variant KD;max of Kolmogorov complexity. We characterize the orders D such that the enumeration theorem (resp. the invariance theorem) also holds for Max^{X\to D}_{Rec} . It turns out that Max^{X\to D}_{Rec} may satisfy the invariance theorem but not the enumeration theorem. Also, when Max^{X\to D}_{Rec} satisfies the invariance theorem then the Kolmogorov complexities associated to Max^{X\to D}_{Rec} and Max^{X\to D}_{PR} are equal (up to a constant). Letting K^D_{min} = K^{D^{rev}}_{max}, where D^{rev} is the reverse order, we prove that either K^D_{min} =_{ct} K^D_{max} =_{ct} K^D (=_{ct} is equality up to a constant) or K^D_{min}, K^D_{max} are <=_{ct} incomparable and <_{ct} K^D and >_{ct} K^{0',D}. We characterize the orders leading to each case. We also show that K^D_{min}, K^D_{max} cannot be both much smaller than K^D at any point. These results are proved in a more general setting with two orders on D, one extending the other.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marie Ferbus-Zanda, Serge Grigorieff. 2008-01-02. Kolmogorov complexities Kmax, Kmin on computable partially ordered sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO