A Partition-Based Relaxation For Steiner Trees

Jochen Konemann; David Pritchard; Kunlun Tan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0712.3568

A Partition-Based Relaxation For Steiner Trees

Jochen Konemann·David Pritchard·Kunlun Tan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Steiner tree problem is a classical NP-hard optimization problem with a wide range of practical applications. In an instance of this problem, we are given an undirected graph G=(V,E), a set of terminals R, and non-negative costs c_e for all edges e in E. Any tree that contains all terminals is called a Steiner tree; the goal is to find a minimum-cost Steiner tree. The nodes V R are called Steiner nodes. The best approximation algorithm known for the Steiner tree problem is due to Robins and Zelikovsky (SIAM J. Discrete Math, 2005); their greedy algorithm achieves a performance guarantee of 1+(ln 3)/2 ~ 1.55. The best known linear (LP)-based algorithm, on the other hand, is due to Goemans and Bertsimas (Math. Programming, 1993) and achieves an approximation ratio of 2-2/|R|. In this paper we establish a link between greedy and LP-based approaches by showing that Robins and Zelikovsky's algorithm has a natural primal-dual interpretation with respect to a novel partition-based linear programming relaxation. We also exhibit surprising connections between the new formulation and existing LPs and we show that the new LP is stronger than the bidirected cut formulation. An instance is b-quasi-bipartite if each connected component of G R has at most b vertices. We show that Robins' and Zelikovsky's algorithm has an approximation ratio better than 1+(ln 3)/2 for such instances, and we prove that the integrality gap of our LP is between 8/7 and (2b+1)/(b+1).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jochen Konemann, David Pritchard, Kunlun Tan. 2007-12-20. A Partition-Based Relaxation For Steiner Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗