arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 0708.1695

Derived Semidistributive Lattices

Abstract

For L a finite lattice, let C(L) denote the set of pairs g = (g_0,g_1) such that g_0 is a lower cover of g_1 and order it as follows: g <= d iff g_0 <= d_0, g_1 <= d_1, but not g_1 <= d_0. Let C(L,g) denote the connected component of g in this poset. Our main result states that C(L,g) is a semidistributive lattice if L is semidistributive, and that C(L,g) is a bounded lattice if L is bounded. Let S_n be the permutohedron on n letters and T_n be the associahedron on n+1 letters. Explicit computations show that C(S_n,a) = S_{n-1} and C(T_n,a) = T_{n-1}, up to isomorphism, whenever a is an atom. These results are consequences of new characterizations of finite join semidistributive and finite lower bounded lattices: (i) a finite lattice is join semidistributive if and only if the projection sending g in C(L) to g_0 in L creates pullbacks, (ii) a finite join semidistributive lattice is lower bounded if and only if it has a strict facet labelling. Strict facet labellings, as defined here, are generalization of the tools used by Barbut et al. to prove that lattices of Coxeter groups are bounded.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luigi Santocanale. 2008-07-21. Derived Semidistributive Lattices. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1695

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Borel sets in ideal topologies

We study the Borel and analytic subsets of the spaces ${}^κκ$ and ${}^κ2$ endowed with ideal topologies, where $κ$ is a regular uncountable cardinal, thereby addressing some open problems of the literature. We provide a systematic analysis of the Borel hierarchy for an arbitrary ideal topology. In particular, we formulate a sufficient condition ensuring that the hierarchy does not collapse, demonstrate that every Borel set in such a topology is analytic, and establish the existence of a set that is not Borel. Our main result shows that, when the underlying ideal contains an unbounded subset, the collection of analytic sets coincides with the full power set of the ambient space. Finally, we prove that the Approximation Lemma holds in the setting of ideal topologies.

math.LO

Inquisitive first-order logic is neither compact nor recursively axiomatizable

Inquisitive first-order logic is an extension of classical first-order logic with formulas regimenting first-order questions, such as "whether all objects are P", "which objects are P", and "what is one object that is P". Since it was first developed in 2009, two major meta-theoretical questions about this logic have remained open, in spite of significant efforts. The first concerns compactness: if a conclusion follows from a set of premises, does it always follow from some finite subset? The second concerns the computational status of validity: is the set of validities recursively enumerable, or equivalently, does the logic admit a recursive axiomatization? We settle both questions in the negative, showing that inquisitive first-order logic is neither compact nor recursively axiomatizable. Furthermore, we prove that it violates another signature property of first-order logic, namely, Craig interpolation. We discuss the significance of our results, and show how to extend them to a closely related logic, viz., inquisitive team logic.

math.LO

The Borel Distinguishing Number of Schreier Graphs

The Borel distinguishing number $D_B(\mathcal{G})$ of a Borel graph $\mathcal{G}$, recently introduced by Bilge and Kaya, is the minimum number of colors required to break the symmetry of $\mathcal{G}$ in a Borel way. In this paper, we investigate the Borel distinguishing number of Schreier graphs induced by the free part of the shift action $Γ\curvearrowright n^Γ$. We prove that $D_B(\mathcal{G})\le n+1$ for $Γ=\mathbb{Z}^d$ equipped with the standard generators. Moreover, we show that $D_B(\mathcal{G})\ge n+1$ if $ Γ$ is amenable and $ \{γ\in \mathrm{Aut}(\mathrm{Cay}(Γ,S)) \mid γ(e) = e \}$ is non-trivial. We also show that $D_B(\mathcal{G})$ is finite if $Γ$ is finitely generated, and give some applications of our results. These results answer some questions raised by Bilge and Kaya.

math.LO