arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0708.0604

Introducing OPTO : Portal for Optical Communities in Indonesia

T. B. Waluyo·L. T. Handoko
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Since January 1, 2005 we have launched "OPTO" Portal, a website dedicated to optical communities in Indonesia. The address of this portal is http://www.opto.lipi.go.id and is self-supporting managed and not for commercial purposes. Our aims in launching this portal are to benefit Internet facility in increasing the communities' scientific activity; to provide an online reference in Indonesian language for optics-based science and technology subjects; as well as to pioneer the communities' online activities with real impacts and benefits for our society. We will describe in the paper the features of this portal that can be utilized by all individuals or members of optical communities to store and share information and to build networks or partnership as well. We realized that this portal is still not popular and most of our aims are still not reached. This conference should be a good place for all of us to collaborate to properly utilize this portal for the advantages to the optical communities in Indonesia and our society at large.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T. B. Waluyo, L. T. Handoko. 2007-08-04. Introducing OPTO : Portal for Optical Communities in Indonesia. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Animarium:Technical Report Version 1

Synthetic populations of eleven Italian municipalities (1,814,317 individuals in 887,937 households) generated from published aggregates alone: ISTAT census and register tables, census-section counts, the national civic-address register, public-use survey microdata, and six municipal open-data portals, every source certified in a registry with licence, fingerprint and declared affordances. Four rings give every attribute a declared place: a maximum-entropy joint model of up to nine demographic attributes; whole-vector donation of twenty-three attitudinal and health variables from survey respondents; placement to census section, single year of age and address; and households constrained by the census size distribution per section. Every downstream layer (detailed titles, work, names, biographies) is a declared derivation adding no information. The pipeline is deterministic to the byte: regenerating all eleven municipalities from the tagged commit reproduces every file of every ring bit for bit, in 33 minutes on one workstation. Populations are released in a public regime enforced in the data (no names, no addresses, coordinates randomised within census section), browsable in Animarium, a dependency-free web viewer where every number carries its comparison and every view is a citable URL, and downloadable as an open dataset. The report documents the architecture, the sources and their certification, the reproducibility and quality measurements at the release tag, the viewer, and the narrative layer that renders records into personas for LLM-driven simulation, with the platform's controllability demonstrated in companion experiments, and validation explicitly out of scope.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Can AI interview? Comparing AI-led to Human-led Chat Interviews

Large language model chatbots have been proposed as AI-interviewers for collecting qualitative interview data at scale, potentially bridging social science's longstanding divide between the breadth of surveys and the depth of qualitative interviews. This paper provides the first direct empirical comparison of data quality in AI-led and human-led interviews. In a randomized experiment (N = 41), university students were interviewed via synchronous text chat by either trained non-expert interviewers or a locally hosted AI system; we evaluate exposure, specificity, and relevance. Median interview duration was similar across conditions, but AI-interviewers asked more than twice as many questions per interview and elicited roughly 65 percent more respondent text per interview. Per-question responses were longer with human interviewers, though not after multiple-testing correction; only AI-condition participants skipped questions. Responses were almost uniformly on-topic in both conditions; for specificity we detect no difference, but the design cannot exclude one of up to three quarters of a point. These results were obtained with a small, locally hosted open-weight model (7B parameters), which addresses concerns about data security, GDPR compliance, and scientific reproducibility. Our findings support the viability of AI-interviewing for large-N qualitative data collection.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Collaborating with AI Agents: Field Experiments on Teamwork, Productivity, and Performance

We examined the mechanisms underlying productivity and performance gains from AI agents using a large-scale experiment on Pairit, a platform we developed to study human-AI collaboration. We randomly assigned 2,234 participants to human-human and human-AI teams that produced 11,024 ads. We evaluated the ads using independent human ratings and a field experiment on X which garnered ~5M impressions. We found human-AI teams produced 50% more ads per worker and higher text quality, while human-human teams produced higher image quality, suggesting a jagged frontier of AI agent capability. Human-AI teams also produced more homogeneous outputs (diversity collapse) as their ads were more self-similar. The field experiment revealed higher text quality (produced by human-AI teams) increased click-through rates and view time, while higher image quality (produced by human-human teams) improved cost-per-click rates. Two mechanisms explained these effects: Human-AI collaboration was significantly more task-oriented and displayed more delegation. AI-appropriate work processes, in turn, improved performance in human-AI teams and transcended the jagged frontier: Task-oriented communication produced higher productivity, higher quality ads across all dimensions, and displayed no diversity collapse in their outputs, while human-AI teams with more interpersonal communication were less productive and produced lower quality ads across all dimensions. In contrast, in human-human teams, interpersonal communication improved productivity. Delegation improved text quality in human-AI teams and was positively associated with diversity collapse, creating homogeneous outputs of higher average quality. The results suggest AI agents drive productivity, performance, and output diversity by reshaping teamwork along the jagged frontier of AI capabilities.

cs.CY↗