arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 0707.3417

When almost all sets are difference dominated

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between the sizes of the sum and difference sets attached to a subset of {0,1,...,N}, chosen randomly according to a binomial model with parameter p(N), with N^{-1} = o(p(N)). We show that the random subset is almost surely difference dominated, as N --> oo, for any choice of p(N) tending to zero, thus confirming a conjecture of Martin and O'Bryant. The proofs use recent strong concentration results. Furthermore, we exhibit a threshold phenomenon regarding the ratio of the size of the difference- to the sumset. If p(N) = o(N^{-1/2}) then almost all sums and differences in the random subset are almost surely distinct, and in particular the difference set is almost surely about twice as large as the sumset. If N^{-1/2} = o(p(N)) then both the sum and difference sets almost surely have size (2N+1) - O(p(N)^{-2}), and so the ratio in question is almost surely very close to one. If p(N) = c N^{-1/2} then as c increases from zero to infinity (i.e., as the threshold is crossed), the same ratio almost surely decreases continuously from two to one according to an explicitly given function of c. We also extend our results to the comparison of the generalized difference sets attached to an arbitrary pair of binary linear forms. For certain pairs of forms f and g, we show that there in fact exists a sharp threshold at c_{f,g} N^{-1/2}, for some computable constant c_{f,g}, such that one form almost surely dominates below the threshold, and the other almost surely above it. The heart of our approach involves using different tools to obtain strong concentration of the sizes of the sum and difference sets about their mean values, for various ranges of the parameter p.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Hegarty, Steven J. Miller. 2008-10-09. When almost all sets are difference dominated. https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.3417

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Solutions of $x_1^2+x_2^2-x_3^2=n^2$ with small $x_3$, revisited

Let $r(N)$ be the number of representations of $N$ as a sum of two squares. For every integer $n\ge 2$ we prove an asymptotic formula for $\sum_{x\equiv e \bmod 2}Φ(x/M)\,r(n^2+x^2)$, that is, for the number of integral solutions of $x_1^2+x_2^2-x_3^2=n^2$ with $x_3\equiv e \bmod 2$ in a range $|x_3|\ll M$, with smooth weight $Φ$. The formula has an explicit secondary term and a power saving in the error term, and it is non-trivial as soon as $M\ge n^{5/6+\varepsilon}$, that is, $M\ge D^{1/2-1/12+\varepsilon}$ with $D=n^2$. The leading term is $\frac{4}π(\log n)\intΦ(x/M)\,dx$, independently of the arithmetic of $n$; this corrects the main term stated in the published version (Ramanujan J. 63 (2024), 293-337). The proof factorises $n+ix_3$ in $\mathbb{Z}[i]$, which leads to Kloosterman sums. These are estimated by Weil's bound, combined with a Plancherel argument that exploits the curvature of the underlying quadric. This paper was written in collaboration with Claude (Opus 5.5, High), an AI model developed by Anthropic.

math.NT↗

Bessel Periods on $U(2,1) \times U(1,1)$, Relative Trace Formula and Non-Vanishing of Central $L$-values

In this paper we calculate the asymptotics of the second moment of the Bessel periods associated to certain holomorphic cuspidal representations $(π, π')$ of $U(2,1) \times U(1,1)$ of regular infinity type (averaged over $π$). Using these, we obtain quantitative non-vanishing results for the Rankin-Selberg central $L$-values $L(1/2, π\times π')$, which are of degree twelve over ${\mathbb Q}$, with concomitant difficulty in applying standard methods, especially since we are in a `conductor dropping' situation. We use the relative trace formula, and the orbital integrals are evaluated rather than compared with others. Besides their intrinsic interest, non-vanishing of these critical values also leads, by known results, to deducing certain associated Selmer groups have rank zero.

math.NT↗

Rational points on $X_0(N)^*$ when $N$ is non-squarefree

Let $N$ be a positive integer and $X_0(N)^*$ be the quotient of the modular curve $X_0(N)$ by its full group of Atkin-Lehner involutions. Elkies conjectures that the rational points on $X_0(N)^*$ are only cusps or CM points when $N$ is large enough. We establish an integrality result for the $j$-invariants of non-cuspidal rational points on $X_0(N)^*$ when $N$ is non-squarefree, representing a significant step toward resolving a key subcase of Elkies' conjecture. To this end, we prove the existence of rank-zero quotients of certain modular Jacobians $J_0(pq)$. Furthermore, in the non-squarefree case we provide a complete classification of the rational points on $X_0(N)^*$ of genus $1 \leq g \leq 5$, when they are finite. In the process we identify exceptional rational points on $X_0(75)^*$ and $X_0(147)^*$ which were not known before.

math.NT↗