arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 0707.0676

A geometrical link between the circle and sexagesimal system

Abstract

This paper presents a simple geometrical fact which could relate to the history of mathematics and astronomy. This fact shows a natural link between the circle and the multiples of 6 and it makes it possible to obtain a simple representation of the 12 months of the year, the 24 hours of the day, the 30 days (average number) of the month and the 360 days (approximate number) of the year, which brings us closer to the sexagesimal division of time. Moreover this representation reminds one of the movement of the planets around a centre. Using this fact one will be able also to find geometrically the principal divisor of number 60, to represent numbers in base 60 with a kind of abacus or calculation table and to make a division of the circle into 6 and 12 equal parts. Afterwards one will be able to obtain a division in 360 unequal parts but relatively close to one another, and the goal isn't precisely to obtain an optimal division of the circle in 360 equal parts but to prove that the idea to divide the circle in 360 equal parts can subsequently be suggested by these geometrical facts that have been showed. In this article the author will not answer the following questions: a) What is the origin of the sexagesimal system? b) By which way could one manage to adopt the sexagesimal system starting from the knowledge of the facts exposed in this article and starting from the knowledge of the astronomical data? These questions could be treated, using information of this article, by the readers or later on by the author.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jaime Vladimir Torres-Heredia Julca. 2007-07-04. A geometrical link between the circle and sexagesimal system. https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0676

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A memorial tribute: Adriano Garsia (1928--2024)

Adriano Mario Garsia was born in Tunis on August 20, 1928, to a Tunisian-Italian family. He lived on a farm there until the end of World War II, then moved to Rome. After finishing high school, he was sent to the United States to live with relatives in Woyming and eventually made his way to California, becoming a student of Charles Loewner at Stanford in the early 1950s. Following his Ph.D., Adriano held positions at MIT, the University of Minnesota, and Caltech before joining the nascent mathematics department at the University of California, San Diego, in 1966 where he spent the remainder of his career. He passed away in San Diego on October 6, 2024, at the age of 96.

math.HO↗

The Siren Call of Silicon Leviathan: Reflections on blowup and Aufklärungsdämmerung

Over three centuries ago our Enlightenment forefathers brought forth in Europe--and later on this continent--a new approach to knowledge production and dissemination, conceived in distrust of authority, and dedicated to the proposition that truth is accessible to human reason. Mathematics, the Enlightenment's firstborn, was its existence proof--knowledge that compels assent without appeal to authority--because the only way to make a theorem certain was to show it to a human mind. Now we are engaged in an existential struggle testing whether mathematics, or any discipline so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met in the wake of the OpenAI press release: 166 pages, 616,000 lines of Lean, produced in 88 hours by some 10,000 software agents, and read in full--at the time of this Siren Call--by no human being. A proof has historically been two things: a certificate that a theorem is true, and a demonstration that lets another person see why. OpenAI delivered the first without the second. But, in a larger sense, what matters is not what the Silicon Leviathan (OpenAI and its peer competitors) produces but rather what we accept. By accepting the certificate without the demonstration, we adopt the Hobbesian bargain: authority, not truth, makes the law. The age that this augurs is--in Panofsky's phrase--a Middle Ages in reverse--its authority a subhuman superintelligence. The great task before us is to frame a covenant under which what has become optional--understanding--remains required: that nothing counts as mathematics until a human being has understood it--and can show the next person why. Whether we will safeguard and keep our sovereign inheritance--decided at the moment of acceptance--which is not yet past--will determine if this Aufklärungsdämmerung spells the Enlightenment's end.

math.HO↗

Computational Platonism

We offer a view of mathematics as an experimental science where axioms play the role of foundational theories like general relativity and quantum mechanics in physics. Under this view, axioms are provisional and inferred from experience with the experiental substrate of mathematics which we locate within computation rather than encoding intuitive and absolute truths. This offers a reframing of Godel's theorem, placing its impact sharply upon the incompleteness rather than the potentially contradictory nature of any computational set of axioms. The essay originated in an attempt to make precise the nature of mathematics in order to estimate how AI might impact it. This exploration is continued in the paired essay "The mechanical creation of mathematical concepts."

math.HO↗