arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0706.0468

On the semimartingale property via bounded logarithmic utility

Kasper Larsen·Gordan Zitkovic
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper provides a new version of the condition of Di Nunno et al. (2003), Ankirchner and Imkeller (2005) and Biagini and \{O}ksendal (2005) ensuring the semimartingale property for a large class of continuous stochastic processes. Unlike our predecessors, we base our modeling framework on the concept of portfolio proportions which yields a short self-contained proof of the main theorem, as well as a counterexample, showing that analogues of our results do not hold in the discontinuous setting.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PMmath.PRq-fin.PR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kasper Larsen, Gordan Zitkovic. 2007-06-04. On the semimartingale property via bounded logarithmic utility. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0468

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Portfolio Choice with Competing Precautionary and Accumulation Goals

We study optimal portfolio choice for a household managing two goals at once. A random-deadline precautionary goal, such as a medical emergency, must be paid in full whenever it arrives and is affordable; a fixed-deadline accumulation goal, such as a target retirement lifestyle, may be declined at its deadline. We show that precautionary saving crowds out growth-oriented investment, and deadline pressure is amplified by the competing precautionary claim. We characterize the value function as the unique viscosity solution of an HJB equation, and derive the household's optimal terminal funding rule. The household funds the fixed-deadline goal exactly when the direct benefit at least offsets the resulting drop in the value of keeping the precautionary goal funded. We calibrate the model and find that both flexibility and fungibility are most valuable at intermediate wealth. Committing in advance to fund a goal sacrifices flexibility, while managing each goal in its own account sacrifices fungibility.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Taming the Greeks: Option Portfolios with Inductive Biases

We present an end-to-end deep learning framework for systematic options trading that directly embeds hedging behavior through explicit control of portfolio-level risk exposures. While neural networks trained to optimize risk-adjusted performance have been shown to outperform traditional rules-based strategies, such approaches remain agnostic to the sensitivities of the resulting portfolios with respect to specific underlying risk factors. We propose a general training objective that combines a performance-driven loss with a differentiable risk-sensitivity penalty, enforcing neutrality to selected risk dimensions. Unlike reinforcement learning methods that approximate optimal hedging policies via simulated market dynamics, our framework operates entirely on historical data and jointly optimizes risk-adjusted returns and targeted risk constraints in a single learning problem. We instantiate the framework on static delta-neutral straddle portfolios with the penalty directed at first-order directional exposure, and evaluate two penalty variants -- an exposure-normalized penalty and a Greek-ratio drift penalty. Empirical results on Nasdaq 100 equity options demonstrate that appropriately calibrated regularization simultaneously improves out-of-sample risk-adjusted performance relative to an unregularized baseline while reducing realized directional exposure.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Return-Decay Residuals and Tail-Risk Forecasting: Timing Artifacts, Conditional Inference, and Cross-Market Evidence

Can residuals from fitted return-decay curves predict future factor tail losses, and do they measure crowding? We distinguish economic edge, overlapping performance statistics, and predictive evidence. A Gaussian counterexample produces a same-month crash-risk ratio of 1.61 without predictable future returns. An eight-factor US reconstruction finds no robust advantage under the original specification. A geographic extension tests six factors in Europe, Japan, and Asia Pacific excluding Japan, with matched baselines and separate 2015-2024 and 2025-August 2026 evaluations. For 2015-2024, pooled regional log loss increases by 0.00704 with frozen augmentation and 0.00233 with annual refitting, although Brier rankings differ and a matched-history US comparison favors the residual. Controlled diagnostics link ranking reversals to feature histories and validation-selected penalties. Holding reference penalties fixed largely removes the reversal, while attribution to history and reselection depends on decomposition order. Sparse validation events do not necessarily imply sensitivity to individual validation months. An equivalent-basis experiment isolates regularization effects: large gaps between representations often reflect poor component forecasts rather than substantial gains over a simple Sharpe baseline. Established sequential bounds allow dependent, nonstationary forecast comparisons under a disclosed research filtration; all 48 intervals include zero and permit nontrivial benefits. These findings establish sensitivity to representation, target definition, and scoring rule, without identifying crowding or establishing prospective forecasting value. Forecasts, unfavorable findings, configurations, and provenance are retained.

q-fin.PM↗