arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0705.2454

Non Gaussianity and Non Stationarity modeled through Hidden Variables and their use in ICA and Blind Source Separation

Ali Mohammad-Djafari
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modeling non Gaussian and non stationary signals and images has always been one of the most important part of signal and image processing methods. In this paper, first we propose a few new models, all based on using hidden variables for modeling either stationary but non Gaussian or Gaussian but non stationary or non Gaussian and non stationary signals and images. Then, we will see how to use these models in independent component analysis (ICA) or blind source separation (BSS). The computational aspects of the Bayesian estimation framework associated with these prior models are also discussed.

Explore related subjects

physics.data-an

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ali Mohammad-Djafari. 2007-05-16. Non Gaussianity and Non Stationarity modeled through Hidden Variables and their use in ICA and Blind Source Separation. https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.2454

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

When Should Team KPIs Be Absolute or Relative for Match-Outcome Prediction?

In rugby union and association football, team key performance indicators (KPIs) can be represented in absolute terms or relative to the opponent. Relativisation sometimes improves match-outcome prediction and sometimes harms it. There has been no general account of when each occurs. The answer depends on how much the two teams differ in variability and how strongly their KPI values rise and fall together. We combine these properties into the Paired Efficiency Factor (PEF), which generalises Fisher's paired-efficiency result to the unequal-variance conditions typical of competitive sport. The PEF also connects a KPI's statistical efficiency to how much information its relative form carries about the outcome. Combined KPIs can interact in complex ways, so we analyse each indicator on its own. Across 86 team KPIs from professional rugby union and association football, the PEF places every metric in one of four regimes. Anti-correlation is common among these KPIs, especially for high-volume competitive counts, and absolute measures are then usually preferable. Relativisation can still improve prediction when a noisier difference carries more outcome information. An idealised simulation and one representative KPI from each regime confirm both signs under team-blocked cross-validation. The same pairing geometry appears in healthcare, genomics, finance, and manufacturing. The PEF is a diagnostic for when to relativise a performance metric and when not to.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

The BRUIT-FM "open data" noise reduction challenge

The BRUIT-FM Challenge asks participants to reduce ''noise'' --- defined as any signal that masks the signal of interest --- on an open dataset of real and synthetic broadband seafloor seismology data. The dataset includes signals from earthquakes, ocean infragravity waves and seafloor currents. It also includes training datasets of synthetic data with reference solutions. Participants are asked to remove or separate these signals to obtain the best earthquake and seafloor compliance signals. The authors will make a first assessment of the submissions, based on noise reduction, signal deformation and ease of use. Participants are invited to a community workshop, in which they will validate the preliminary assessment and collaborate on a community paper describing the results, identifying promising pathways and proposing new directions. The best results will be added to a new version of the dataset, which will persist as a benchmark for future developments.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Data geometry preserves prediction but reshapes explanation

Across scientific domains, empirical data often give rise to positive semidefinite matrices that encode similarities, couplings or interactions and induce natural geometries. We investigate whether changing the geometry used to compare the same empirical representations preserves subject-level performance and the local structures from which explanations are derived, a question we term the prediction explanation invariance problem. We address this problem across morphometric MRI, fMRI and EEG data by comparing Frobenius and trace geometries applied to the same empirical matrices. Predictive performance was broadly preserved across geometries, but comparable performance did not imply agreement in subject-level decision scores or predicted labels. Predictive similarity also masked geometry-dependent differences in local neighbourhoods, perturbation sensitivities and explanatory rankings. Dimensionality reduction made the two subject-space geometries progressively more concordant, while classification performance and decision-level agreement declined. These results identify data geometry as a hidden degree of freedom in explainability: similar performance does not guarantee invariant decisions or explanations.

physics.data-an↗