arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0705.2396

Nonlinear generalized functions and the Heisenberg-Pauli foundations of Quantum Field Theory

Jean-Francois Colombeau·Andre Gsponer·Bernard Perrot
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1929 Heisenberg and Pauli laid the foundations of QFT by quantizing the fields (method of canonical quantization). This general theory of quantized fields has remained undisputed up to now. We show how the unmodified Heisenberg-Pauli calculations make sense mathematically by using a theory of generalized functions adapted to nonlinear operations. By providing an appropriate mathematical setting, nonlinear generalized functions open doors for their understanding but there remains presumably very hard technical problems. (i) Domains of the interacting field operators: a priori the H-P calculations give time dependent dense domains, what is not very convenient; (ii) Calculations of the resulting matrix elements of the S operator: from the unitarity of the S operator as a whole there are no longer ``infinities,'' but a priori there is no other hope than heavy computer calculations; (iii) Connection with renormalization theory: it should provide an approximation when the coupling constant is small. The aim of this paper is to present, on the grounds of a standard mathematical model of QFT (a self interacting scalar boson field), a basis for improvement without significant prerequisites in mathematics and physics. It is an attempt to use nonlinear generalized functions in QFT, starting directly from the calculations made by physicists, in the same way as they have already been used in classical mechanics and general relativity.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jean-Francois Colombeau, Andre Gsponer, Bernard Perrot. 2008-07-03. Nonlinear generalized functions and the Heisenberg-Pauli foundations of Quantum Field Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.2396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗