arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 0705.1576

On Shalika Periods and a Theorem of Jacquet-Martin

Abstract

Let πbe a cuspidal automorphic representation of GL_4 with central character μ^2. It is known that πhas Shalika period with respect to μif and only if the L-function L^S(s, π, \bigwedge^2\otimesμ^{-1}) has a pole at s=1. Recentlt, Jacquet and Martin considered the analogous question for cuspidal representations π_D of the inner form GL_2(D)(\A), and obtained a partial result via the relative trace formula. In this paper, we provide a complete solution to this problem via the method of theta correspondence, and give necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of Shalika period for π_D. We also resolve the analogous question in the local setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wee Teck Gan, Shuichiro Takeda. 2008-05-18. On Shalika Periods and a Theorem of Jacquet-Martin. https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A few remarks on a Manin-Mumford conjecture in function field arithmetic and generalized Pila-Wilkie estimates

We present here the natural extension of our Pila-Wilkie type estimates on the number of rational points of the trascendent part of a compact analytic subset of $\mathbb{F}_{q}((1/T))^{n}$ to analogous subsets of $K^{n}$, where $K$ is a general local field of any characteristic. That would integrate the analogous estimate provided by F. Loeser, G. Comte and R. Cluckers in characteristic 0.

math.NT↗

No new Goormaghtigh primes up to $10^{700}$

The Goormaghtigh conjecture states that the only two numbers which have two non-trivial representations as repunits are $31$ and $8191$. We call such a prime number a {\it Goormaghtigh prime}. We show that there are no other Goormaghtigh primes less than $10^{700}$.

math.NT↗