arXiv · 0704.1041
We study asymptotics of various Euclidean geometric phenomena as the dimension tend to infinity.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Steven G. Krantz. 2007-04-08. Higher dimensional conundra. https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.1041
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We prove the spherical Hadwiger theorem in every dimension: for $n\geq1$, every continuous $\mathrm{SO}(n+1)$-invariant valuation on all closed spherical convex sets in the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^n$ is a unique linear combination of the spherical intrinsic volumes $V_0,\ldots,V_n$. The same classification holds on sets contained in an open hemisphere, with unique continuous invariant extension to the full domain. We first classify simple invariant valuations by an independent induction on dimension. Averaging a signed cone identity gives the spherical volume term; the remaining terms are signed coning transforms that vanish by the lower-dimensional simple classification. A second induction, together with extension to non-proper sets, gives the general classification. The cone--sphere correspondence yields, for $d\geq2$, the corresponding classification on all closed convex cones in $\mathbb{R}^d$, without normalization at the zero cone. In both settings, $\mathrm{SO}$-invariance implies $\mathrm{O}$-invariance.
We prove the equivalence of several notions of infinitesimally Euclidean-like behaviour for metric surfaces appearing in the literature. We obtain in particular that metric surfaces with property (ET) are universally infinitesimally Hilbertian.
We prove that if a triangle is cut into $N$ congruent triangles and $N$ is prime, then $N=2$, $N=3$, or $N\equiv 1 \pmod 4$, and every such $N$ occurs. In particular, if $N > 3$ then $N$ is not a prime congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. The argument divides into cases according to possible shapes of the tiled triangle. Let $α,β,γ$ be the angles of the tile. Prior to this posting, there remained several open shapes. The two most difficult shapes were $(2α,β,α+β)$, the {\em triquadratic} shape, and $(β,β,3α)$, the {\em isosceles-$β$} shape, in which $3α+2β= π$ and $α$ is not a rational multiple of $π$. A previous version of this paper relied on incorrect proofs of those cases, which have been retracted, and are replaced here by correct proofs. For each of those two shapes the number of tiles has the form $N = j^2 N_0$, where $N_0 > 1$ is determined by the shape of the tile and $j$ is a positive integer; so $N$ is prime, or even squarefree, only if $j = 1$. We prove by geometric reasoning that neither shape admits a tiling with $j = 1$, which shows that for both shapes $N$ is never prime, and indeed never squarefree. The shape $(β,β,3α+β)$ (where $3α+ 3β= π$) has been settled by Bonfioli. In this paper, we settle the remaining cases, by number-theoretic arguments based on the area equation. Those proofs rule out $N$ prime, but not $N$ squarefree, and we give examples to show that tilings with squarefree $N$ do sometimes exist.