Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system

Anthony F. J. van Raan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0704.0889

Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system

Anthony F. J. van Raan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For the 100 largest European universities we studied the statistical properties of bibliometric indicators related to research performance, field citation density and journal impact. We find a size-dependent cumulative advantage for the impact of universities in terms of total number of citations. In previous work a similar scaling rule was found at the level of research groups. Therefore we conjecture that this scaling rule is a prevalent property of the science system. We observe that lower performance universities have a larger size-dependent cumulative advantage for receiving citations than top-performance universities. We also find that for the lower-performance universities the fraction of not-cited publications decreases considerably with size. Generally, the higher the average journal impact of the publications of a university, the lower the number of not-cited publications. We find that the average research performance does not dilute with size. Large top-performance universities succeed in keeping a high performance over a broad range of activities. This most probably is an indication of their scientific attractive power. Next we find that particularly for the lower-performance universities the field citation density provides a strong cumulative advantage in citations per publication. The relation between number of citations and field citation density found in this study can be considered as a second basic scaling rule of the science system. Top-performance universities publish in journals with significantly higher journal impact as compared to the lower performance universities. We find a significant decrease of the fraction of self-citations with increasing research performance, average field citation density, and average journal impact.

Explore related subjects

physics.data-an physics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Anthony F. J. van Raan. 2007-04-06. Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system. https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0889

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

An Algebra Bundle for Non-Composable Coincidence Probabilities in Gamma-ray Spectroscopy

Understanding nuclear level schemes from the detection of emitted gamma-rays is, at its core, a combinatorial problem. The transition matrix formalism that treats nuclear decay as a Markov process is a well established treatment for the prediction of emitted and detected gamma-rays. However, with the path algebra being the underlying algebra of such matrix methods, the formalism is restricted to calculating probabilities only for composable paths through the decay. This paper presents a new algebra that allows for the calculations of non-composable coincidence probabilities offering a more complete formalism for the prediction of gamma-ray spectra. The aim of this \textit{coincidence algebra} is to provide a general treatment for predicting all full energy summing peaks for composable and non-composable transitions. Non-composable summing peaks often corrupt peaks of interest by creating doublets in the energy spectra. The coincidence algebra serves as a tool for investigating any possible doublets produced from full energy coincidence summing. This formalism is tested for the prediction of gamma-ray peaks in the electron capture of $^{133}$Ba and compared to the results a Geant4 simulation of the decay within the GRIFFIN spectrometer. It is also shown how the path algebra formalism may be useful for understanding uncertainty propagation in nuclear level schemes.

physics.data-an↗

arXiv2026

When Should Team KPIs Be Absolute or Relative for Match-Outcome Prediction?

In rugby union and association football, team key performance indicators (KPIs) can be represented in absolute terms or relative to the opponent. Relativisation sometimes improves match-outcome prediction and sometimes harms it. There has been no general account of when each occurs. The answer depends on how much the two teams differ in variability and how strongly their KPI values rise and fall together. We combine these properties into the Paired Efficiency Factor (PEF), which generalises Fisher's paired-efficiency result to the unequal-variance conditions typical of competitive sport. The PEF also connects a KPI's statistical efficiency to how much information its relative form carries about the outcome. Combined KPIs can interact in complex ways, so we analyse each indicator on its own. Across 86 team KPIs from professional rugby union and association football, the PEF places every metric in one of four regimes. Anti-correlation is common among these KPIs, especially for high-volume competitive counts, and absolute measures are then usually preferable. Relativisation can still improve prediction when a noisier difference carries more outcome information. An idealised simulation and one representative KPI from each regime confirm both signs under team-blocked cross-validation. The same pairing geometry appears in healthcare, genomics, finance, and manufacturing. The PEF is a diagnostic for when to relativise a performance metric and when not to.

physics.data-an↗

arXiv2026

The BRUIT-FM "open data" noise reduction challenge

The BRUIT-FM Challenge asks participants to reduce ''noise'' --- defined as any signal that masks the signal of interest --- on an open dataset of real and synthetic broadband seafloor seismology data. The dataset includes signals from earthquakes, ocean infragravity waves and seafloor currents. It also includes training datasets of synthetic data with reference solutions. Participants are asked to remove or separate these signals to obtain the best earthquake and seafloor compliance signals. The authors will make a first assessment of the submissions, based on noise reduction, signal deformation and ease of use. Participants are invited to a community workshop, in which they will validate the preliminary assessment and collaborate on a community paper describing the results, identifying promising pathways and proposing new directions. The best results will be added to a new version of the dataset, which will persist as a benchmark for future developments.

physics.data-an↗