arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0704.0065

Littlewood-Richardson polynomials

A. I. Molev
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce a family of rings of symmetric functions depending on an infinite sequence of parameters. A distinguished basis of such a ring is comprised by analogues of the Schur functions. The corresponding structure coefficients are polynomials in the parameters which we call the Littlewood-Richardson polynomials. We give a combinatorial rule for their calculation by modifying an earlier result of B. Sagan and the author. The new rule provides a formula for these polynomials which is manifestly positive in the sense of W. Graham. We apply this formula for the calculation of the product of equivariant Schubert classes on Grassmannians which implies a stability property of the structure coefficients. The first manifestly positive formula for such an expansion was given by A. Knutson and T. Tao by using combinatorics of puzzles while the stability property was not apparent from that formula. We also use the Littlewood-Richardson polynomials to describe the multiplication rule in the algebra of the Casimir elements for the general linear Lie algebra in the basis of the quantum immanants constructed by A. Okounkov and G. Olshanski.

Explore related subjects

math.AGmath.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A. I. Molev. 2007-07-16. Littlewood-Richardson polynomials. https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0065

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Ceresa Cycles of $X_{0}(N)$

The Ceresa cycle is an algebraic 1-cycle on the Jacobian of an algebraic curve. Although it is homologically trivial, Ceresa famously proved that for a very general complex curve of genus at least 3, it is non-trivial in the Chow group. In this paper we study the Ceresa cycle attached to the complete modular curve $X_{0}(N)$ modulo rational equivalence. For prime level $p$ we give a complete description, namely we prove that if $X_{0}(p)$ is not hyperelliptic, then its Ceresa cycle is non-torsion. For general level $N$, we prove that there are finitely many $X_{0}(N)$ with torsion Ceresa cycle. Our method relies on the relationship between the vanishing of the Ceresa cycle and Chow-Heegner points on the Jacobian. We use the geometry and arithmetic of modular Jacobians to prove that such points are of infinite order and therefore deduce non-vanishing of the Ceresa cycle.

math.AG↗
arXiv2026

Uniform vector bundles over $\mathbb{P}^4$

There is a long-standing conjecture which states that every uniform algebraic vector bundle of rank $r<2n$ on the $n$-dimensional projective space $\mathbb{P}^n$ over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$ is homogeneous. This conjecture is valid for $n\leq3$. In this paper, we classify all uniform vector bundles of rank $r<8$ over $\mathbb{P}^4$ and show that the conjecture holds for $n=4$.

math.AG↗
arXiv2026

Splitting vector bundles over real algebraic varieties

Suppose $X$ is a smooth affine real variety and $\mathscr{E}$ is a vector bundle over $X$. We analyze the problem of splitting off a free rank one summand from $\mathscr{E}$ in corank $0$ and $1$. The problem in corank $0$ can be viewed as the search for a real analog of Murthy's celebrating splitting theorem in the algebraically closed case: to wit, beyond the vanishing of the top Chern class in Chow theory, are the obstructions to splitting ``purely topological''? In a sense, the answer in this case is yes, and we give a proof, using motivic techniques, of a mild extension of the results of Bhatwadekar-Sridharan and Bhatwadekar-Das-Mandal. In corank $1$, in the algebraically closed situation, Murthy's splitting conjecture (now a theorem in characteristic $0$) predicts that the vanishing of the top Chern class in Chow theory is the only obstruction to splitting off a free rank $1$ summand, and we can search for a suitable ``real'' analog of this assertion. We observe that several natural guesses for a ``real'' analog of Murthy's splitting conjecture cannot be true, i.e., that the situation over the real numbers is rather complicated.

math.AG↗